legal matter

Musings on Law, Policy and Governance

Know More


legal problem

Problems for Mediation & Client Counselling

Know more


thought provoking articles

Join the weekend discussion club

know more

Latest Posts

  • The world is going crazy about 5G. Should India be allowing Huawei? The question has gathered more importance in view of US President Donald Trump's visit to India. But what is 5G, what can it...


  • Have you heard about SUVAS? No? Well, it is the software for translating Supreme Court judgments into different languages. SUVAS is the acronym for Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software. It is an...


  • Seagram’s Music CDs, Kingfisher Bottled Water and whatnot, the general public has seen these advertisements first hand. On occasions, one also finds such products on the market shelves. While most...


The Supreme Court today gave its judgment in the case of entry of foreign law firms in India. The court hearing the appeals from decisions of Madras High Court and Bombay High Court held that foreign law firms could have a limited practice of fly in and fly out in India. However it were not the foreign law firms but also the legal process outsourcing companies in India that were waiting for the judgment with bated breath. 

In para 39 of the judgment, the Apex Court held, “Thus, we uphold the view that practice of law includes litigation as well as non litigation.” This clearly means that LPOs will now be covered by the definition of legal practice in India. However, the real deal for LPOs is reflected in para 43 of the judgment which states, “The BPO companies providing range of customized and integrated services and functions to its customers may not violate the provisions of the Advocates Act, only if the activities in pith and substance do not amount to practice of law. The manner in which they are styled may not be conclusive. As already explained, if their services do not directly or indirectly amount to practice of law, the Advocates Act may not apply. This is a matter which may have to be dealt with on case to case basis having regard to a fact situation.”

LPOs do not appear before any Court, authority or person. Most of them work on foreign laws, which has been included in the definition of law practice. In an age where overzealous Bar Council is trying its jurisdiction on every sundry issue, making of Regulations is a real challenge before it. Until then, LPOs shall always be in the fear of being shut down or at least facing an inspection by the Bar Council. 

Also, it is not a fact that the judgment satisfies everyone. Crucially, in para 40, the Court has observed, “Scheme in Chapter-IV of the Advocates Act makes it clear that advocates enrolled with the Bar Council alone are entitled to practice law, except as otherwise provided in any other law. All others can appear only with the permission of the court, authority or person before whom the proceedings are pending.” 

Thus, it is clear that the ball is now in Bar Council's Court, which is a player as well as the referee. Are we going to see fresh litigation if a certain entity is practicing law or not? Watch out.

gaurav pathak criminal lawyerI am a lawyer practicing before the Courts in Delhi. I completed my B.A. LL.B. (Hons) from Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow in 2016. My schooling happened all over the country, as a result of which I can speak and understand a number of languages. My general areas of interest are law, technology, sports and arts. I happen to write few short posts, which are there in Snippets. The problems that I have drafted for several Client Counselling and Mediation Competitions are present in Propositions. The Gallery contains pictures of competitions that I have attended as an assessor and also as a participant. I tweet from @janhityachika and Instagram from @lucknowmail. Currently working on my magnum opus, “Two Worlds”.

facebook gaurav pathak     linkedin gaurav pathak

janhityachika gaurav pathak     Gaurav Pathak Instagram lucknowmail

Developed & maintained by Delhi Website Studio.