SNIPPETS

legal matter

Musings on Law, Policy and Governance

Know More

Propositions

legal problem

Problems for Mediation & Client Counselling

Know more

Brainstorm

thought provoking articles

Join the weekend discussion club

know more

Latest Posts

  • The world is going crazy about 5G. Should India be allowing Huawei? The question has gathered more importance in view of US President Donald Trump's visit to India. But what is 5G, what can it...

    Read more...

  • Have you heard about SUVAS? No? Well, it is the software for translating Supreme Court judgments into different languages. SUVAS is the acronym for Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software. It is an...

    Read more...

  • Seagram’s Music CDs, Kingfisher Bottled Water and whatnot, the general public has seen these advertisements first hand. On occasions, one also finds such products on the market shelves. While most...

    Read more...

A lawyer can challenge everything. Many a times, even universal truths. So how could the black gown be an exception? In June 2016, the Madras High Court dealt with a PIL by a lawyer who was demanding that it be ensured across all courts that the lawyers are wearing the proper dress. The High Court said that most of the lawyers do abide by the dress code and hence there was no need to issue fresh directions. Anyway, if someone was found to be in violation, then that specific case could be individually dealt. Does that mean that all the lawyers are happy with what they wear? No.

In the summer this year, lawyers of Calcutta High Court wrote to the Chief Justice, asking that the summer vacations be extended due to the unbearable heat. The lawyers also prayed that the system of gowns be re-looked at, considering the heat. The Bar Council of India too had supported the move of lawyers in lower courts not mandatorily having to wear black gowns. But nothing came out the move, neither the vacations were extended, nor the black gown was made optional.

A challenge to the constitutional validity of having to wearing a gown was made before the Kerala High Court. In its 2015 judgment, the High Court held that wearing a black gown was a reasonable restriction and hence within constitutional norms.

Thus, the challenge to gown has always seen failure. The Kerala High Court relied on multiple judgments that provided for lawyers as a class, and the need for differentiating them from litigants. Perhaps it is the system of privileges that the lawyers have designed from themselves that needs to change. A mere I-Card can differentiate a layman from a lawyer. Why do we need to celebrate landmark judgments wearing a mourning dress?

gaurav pathak criminal lawyerI am a lawyer practicing before the Courts in Delhi. I completed my B.A. LL.B. (Hons) from Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow in 2016. My schooling happened all over the country, as a result of which I can speak and understand a number of languages. My general areas of interest are law, technology, sports and arts. I happen to write few short posts, which are there in Snippets. The problems that I have drafted for several Client Counselling and Mediation Competitions are present in Propositions. The Gallery contains pictures of competitions that I have attended as an assessor and also as a participant. I tweet from @janhityachika and Instagram from @lucknowmail. Currently working on my magnum opus, “Two Worlds”.

facebook gaurav pathak     linkedin gaurav pathak

janhityachika gaurav pathak     Gaurav Pathak Instagram lucknowmail

Developed & maintained by Delhi Website Studio.